Mountain
Ice Mountain
green mountains
Evening Buildings
Saguaro
Desert
chicago-illinois-usa-downtown-city-skyline
chicago-skyline-modern-architecture
chicago-city-skyscrapers-on-the-river-canal
chicago-usa-october-chicago
chicago-buckingham-fountain
chicago-downtown-lake-michigan

Construction Counsel

Placerat dolor elit tellus non maecena

Placerat dolor elit tellus non maecena

Semper mi est euismod quisque; nunc magna dapibus integer. Ullamcorper ultricies ad ultrices erat sapien tristique. Placerat dolor elit tellus non maecenas laoreet lacus. Neque erat nam suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis.

Learn More
image (2)

Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus

suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis. Dis interdum maximus placerat eleifend interdum sed. Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus non accumsan rutrum. Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin donec curabitur dictum sagittis.

Learn More
congue ultricies
congue ultricies facilisis habitant

congue ultricies facilisis habitant

Inceptos duis phasellus in mus

Semper mi est euismod quisque; nunc magna dapibus integer. Ullamcorper ultricies ad ultrices erat sapien tristique. Placerat dolor elit tellus non maecenas laoreet lacus. Neque erat nam suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis. Dis interdum maximus placerat eleifend interdum sed. Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus non accumsan rutrum. Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin donec curabitur dictum sagittis.

Learn More
maximus placerat
congue ultricies facilisis habitant

maximus placerat eleifend interdum

Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin

Semper mi est euismod quisque; nunc magna dapibus integer. Ullamcorper ultricies ad ultrices erat sapien tristique. Placerat dolor elit tellus non maecenas laoreet lacus. Neque erat nam suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis. Dis interdum maximus placerat eleifend interdum sed. Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus non accumsan rutrum. Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin donec curabitur dictum sagittis.

Learn More

maximus placerat eleifend interdum

suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis. Dis interdum maximus placerat eleifend interdum sed. Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus non accumsan rutrum. Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin donec curabitur dictum sagittis.

Read More

Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin

suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis. Dis interdum maximus placerat eleifend interdum sed. Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus non accumsan rutrum. Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin donec curabitur dictum sagittis.

Read More

Ullamcorper ultricies ad ultrices erat sapien

suspendisse aenean suspendisse primis. Dis interdum maximus placerat eleifend interdum sed. Vivamus nostra dapibus cursus non accumsan rutrum. Nullam scelerisque ultricies sollicitudin donec curabitur dictum sagittis.

Read More

Design-Builders

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Architects And Engineers

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Real Estate Developers

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Institutional Property Owners

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Institutional Real Estate Investors

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Real Estate Service Companies

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Ultra High-End Single-Family Residence Owners

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Owner’s Representatives

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Interior Designers

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 

Contractors

  • Firm Guides Design-Builder in $35M Auto Manufacturing Facility
    Faced with a $6.8 million payment dispute and a cybersecurity theft on a critical $35 million automobile manufacturing facility project, our design-build client turned to us for help. The project, involving design and construction of a line for a major automobile manufacturer, was nearing completion, but the outstanding payment threatened our client and its relationships with key subconsultants. The cybersecurity incident added a layer of complexity, requiring careful navigation. We secured our client’s interest by recording an approximately $6.8 million mechanics lien claim and by pursuing many legal remedies, including litigation against the project owner and its sureties, never losing sight of the value of preserving our client’s key business relationships and its desire for early, cost-efficient dispute resolution. We engaged in mediation and direct negotiation with the key stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving, while our client completed the project. This approach, combining decisive action with a commitment to amicable resolution, resulted in a win-win outcome. The modern system achieved completion, it passed the owner’s acceptance testing, was put into operation – and its designers and builders were compensated for their work. Our client’s key relationships with the project owner and its specialty subconsultants were preserved for collaboration on future projects in this tight-knit industry. 
  • Firm Wins Landmark Lawsuit Limiting Mechanics Lien SubordinationOur client, a design-build firm, faced a significant challenge when a construction lender tried to extinguish its mechanics lien on a Chicago high-rise project. The lender argued a subordination agreement, signed at the project’s outset, eliminated our client’s lien rights. This tactic, once commonplace, was directly addressed by amendments to the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act in 2014, passed after the seminal Cypress Creek decision. These amendments sought to protect designers and builders from being compelled to waive their lien rights as a condition of project financing. Our client’s case presented the first known judicial test of these important revisions. We vigorously contested the lender’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the subordination agreement violated the amended Lien Act by requiring our client to surrender its lien rights before 50% of the loan had been disbursed. This was the very type of practice the legislature intended to prevent. Our team successfully showed that the lender’s interpretation of the mechanics lien Act would effectively nullify the 2014 amendments. The court agreed with our analysis, denying the lender’s motion to dismiss our client’s mechanics lien claim with prejudice, cinching the priority of our client’s mechanics lien over the lender’s mortgage lien. This landmark victory protected our client and affirms the strength of the 2014 amendments to the Mechanics Lien Act, safeguarding the rights of lien claimants throughout Illinois. 
congue ultricies facilisis habitant
watch full video

New at Blog

Video FAQs